A TRIAL BY ANY OTHER NAME: DAISEY KATES AND INJUSTICE IN PRETRIAL REVOCATION OF PROBATION AND PAROLE

Volume 98, No. 1, Fall 2025

By Brenna McGowan [PDF]

It is considered “good law” in Pennsylvania that prosecution can bring a violation of probation or parole (VOP) hearing for a direct violation of the conditions of parole even before the alleged violation’s substantive criminal trial takes place. Mrs. Kates’s name has since become synonymous with pretrial VOP hearings for direct violations. This Comment calls for a true end to this unjust and unfair practice, arguing primarily that “Daisey Kates” hearings serve as an unconstitutional prosecutorial back channel that undermines appropriate criminal procedure, allowing the accused to be incarcerated under the preponderance standard without proper access to due process.

Tags: header-spotlight, spotlight

* Brynn C. Chafin, Temple University Beasley School of Law, 2024. Introduction On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump was sworn into office for his second term as President of the United States of America.[1] Although his administration has and will continue to affect all parts of American life, it will impact the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act […]

By Fiona Burke, Temple Law Review Volume 96 Staff Editor Liberals have, as exit polls and Bernie Sanders point out, largely lost the working class and, in fact, most of America. There are many reasons for this, all of which have been dissected and analyzed ad nauseum in the past few weeks and likely will be for even years. One such […]

Author: Jasnoor Hundal In early August 2023, the Supreme Court stayed the Second Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision, In re Purdue Pharma L.P., and granted certiorari to hear oral argument in December of 2023. The parties were asked to brief and argue “[w]hether the Bankruptcy Code authorizes a court to approve, as part of a […]