Chief Judge Harvey Bartle III, almost fifteen years ago, detailed the origin and development of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania from 1789 into a twenty-first century arbiter of a vast variety of disputes never contemplated by the Framers. Chief Judge Bartle, through studying key cases and the judges’ backgrounds, offered lessons from public servants addressing disputes in a developing nation. Judge Bartle ably continues his study along with several of his colleagues from 2009. But we face a new generation in 2025. The rapidly growing and diverse community, educated in technology and instant news cycles, created a need to address the crucial role of federal judges in our constitutional democracy in an effective manner. This need requires judges and professional court personnel drawn from widely varied experiences who are equally able to resolve disputes and offer timely insight into the role of judges in ensuring the rule of law.
The latest generation serving the nine counties in Southeastern Pennsylvania (including probation and pretrial services officers, and dozens of members of the clerk of court staff) is now called upon to address a more diverse and litigation-savvy population and media environment along with pronounced national concerns with criminal justice reform and reducing costs in civil trials. The court faces rapid development of technological tools used by the persons before it. It also faces a cry from the public and elected officials to diversify representation of judges, jurors, and court professionals.
The evolving court, led by inspired chief judges, responded to acclaim at each turn, including during challenges posed by the political branches’ budget shutdown followed by a once in a century pandemic. The court adjusted to reduced allocations for professional staff, impaired funding, and outdated prepandemic technology. The court also responded to presidential and congressional interest in innovative treatment courts for persons facing reentry, mental health challenges, and drug relapse impairing their efforts to steer clear of further criminal conduct. The court at all levels developed several treatment modalities for persons working their way through the criminal justice system. While we recognize that the court today addresses a lower number of prisoner petitions, personal injury claims, and products liability cases than in 2009, it addresses more cases in intellectual property and civil rights. And, as true of the court for decades, the judges continue to preside by designation in matters from across the country in multidistrict cases as well as in dozens of matters each year from outside Eastern Pennsylvania.
This Essay addresses how one larger United States district court—through a generation of public servants with varied legal expertise but a common public service background—transformed the administration of justice under federal law in Eastern Pennsylvania over the past fifteen years. We first introduce the lawyers called to public service over the past fifteen years in the court. We next address how the judges drawn from across the district expanded and introduced novel criminal justice treatment courts to national acclaim and modeling. We then address the role of this district’s judges in the community to an unprecedented extent across the nation. We lastly address how a large federal district court adapted in response to challenges posed by the 2019 government budgetary shutdown and a worldwide pandemic. The lessons from these events continue to inform the bench and bar in serving the community.
Click PDF to read the full Essay.